Below you will find bill and position statements for each committee.
If you are a Lobbyist, please review the bill and analysis you are assigned to support or oppose. Follow this link for additional instructions for your role.
If you are a Chair, please review both bills for the committee that you are assigned. Follow this link for additional instructions on your role.
If you are unsure of your assignment, find your Onsite information along the side and follow the “VIP assignments” link.
SUPPORTING POSITION: You want to require Michigan law enforcement officers to wear and use a body camera when on duty, in uniform, and carrying a taser or weapon to provide for greater accountability and safety for both public and within law enforcement.
OPPOSING POSITION: You do NOT want to require Michigan law enforcement officers to wear and use a body camera when on duty and carrying a taser or weapon, due to concerns of privacy and the dangers of a blanket policy for all local law enforcement agencies.
Bill & Analysis
Bill and Analysis – HB 5019 Body Cameras
Testimonies
Supporting Arguments – Testimony
Opposing Arguments – Testimony
Additional Resources
Explanatory Article – Pros and Cons of Police Body Cameras
Explanatory Article – Police Body Camera Benefits
Explanatory Article – Police Misconduct and Accountability, 2020
Explanatory Article – Assessing the Effectiveness of Police Body Cameras
SUPPORTING POSITION: You want to allow Newborn Safety Devices (NSDs) to be installed and used at emergency service provider locations in order to ensure the safety of newborns who are being legally abandoned by parents who are unwilling to engage in face-to-face interaction while legally abandoning their child. This bill would amend current Safe Haven Laws which you believe have been effective, but the protections should go one step further.
OPPOSING POSITION: You oppose this bill. You believe that additional complications would arise with this bill including the question of whether the mother is actually the one surrendering the baby, how much additional training must be given to the ones who must monitor the surrender, and the potential increased rates of abandonment as a result. It does not address who will be held liable happens to a baby placed in an NSD as well as requiring standards for NSD to be outlined by the Michigan department of Health after the bill passes, rather than including those standards in the bill itself. This means that no one will know what those standards are until after this bill is signed into law.
Bill & Analysis
Bill and Analysis – HB 5751 Safe Haven Device
Testimonies
Supporting Arguments – Testimony
Opposing Arguments – Testimony
Additional Resources
Explanatory Article – Baby Boxes, Safe Haven Laws: A “Last Resort’ to Curb Infant Abandonment
Explanatory Article – FAQ: Safe Haven Movement, Baby Boxes, and Laws
SUPPORTING POSITION: Wireless providers should be required by law to provide the location information on a wireless device to a law enforcement officer in emergency conditions.
OPPOSING POSITION: Wireless providers should have the freedom to decide whether to release location information on a cell phone to a law enforcement officer in an emergency.
Bill & Analysis
Bill and Analysis – HB 4006 Cell Phones in Emergencies
Testimonies
Supporting Arguments – Testimony
Supporting Arguments – Testimony 2
Opposing Arguments – Testimony
Additional Resources
Explanatory Article – Supporting Arguments – 2022 Statistics
Explanatory Article – Kelsey Smith’s Family 15 Years Later
Explanatory Article – Opposing Arguments – Article and Opinion Piece
SUPPORTING POSITION: You want schools to be required to create a policy formally prohibiting bullying with procedures and punishments.
OPPOSING POSITION: You want schools to have the freedom to decide procedure and policy for bullying on a case by case basis.
Bill & Analysis
Bill and Analysis – HB 4162 Prohibit Bullying
Testimonies
Supporting Arguments – Testimony
Opposing Arguments – Testimony 1
Opposing Arguments – Testimony 2
Opposing Arguments – Testimony 3
Additional Resources
Explanatory Article – School Safety in Michigan
SUPPORTING POSITION: You want to allow terminally ill patients the right to try experimental treatments whose effectiveness, safety, or danger is still unknown. You believe that this will give patients hope and help further medical research.
OPPOSING POSITION: You want the status quo to remain in place, which denies terminally ill patients the right to try experimental treatments whose effectiveness, safety, and danger is still unknown. You believe that there are inherent risks associated with this bill. Namely, you’re concerned that the patient may not fully understand what he/she is consenting to or that medical personal could pressure terminally ill patients to undergo experimental treatment free from liability.
Bill & Analysis
Bill and Analysis – SB 991 Right to Try
Testimonies
Supporting Arguments – Testimony
Opposing Arguments – Testimony
Additional Resources
Explanatory Article – Assessment of the Right-to-Try Law: The Pros and the Cons
Explanatory Article – Pharmacy and Therapeutics
Explanatory Article – Ethics of ‘Right to Try’ Laws
SUPPORTING POSITION: Individuals who have spent time in prison for a crime they did not commit SHOULD BE AUTOMATICALLY COMPENSATED.
OPPOSING POSITION: THE STATUS QUO SHOULD BE PRESERVED allowing wrongfully imprisoned individuals to sue state for compensation.
Bill & Analysis
Bill and Analysis – SB 98 Wrongful Imprisonment Compensation
Testimonies
Supporting Arguments – Testimony
Supporting Arguments – Testimony 2
Opposing Arguments – Testimony
Opposing Arguments – Testimony 2
Additional Resources
Supporting Arguments – Article
Supporting Arguments – Statistics
Washtenaw Christian Academy- Wednesday, April 30th, 2025
8:30-8:50am – Orientation with SSI Staff
9:00am – Introductions to Students
9:10am-10:40am – Committee Meetings
10:40am-10:50am – Optional Reception with students
Location
Washtenaw Christian Academy
Thank you so much for your help!
If you need help, please feel free to contact us with any questions or concerns.
Grace Anne Rosbury
Director of Programs
Email:
Programs@ssionline.org
Phone:
517-321-6233